Decisions · Court · United States

Thaler v. Vidal (DABUS)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022-08-05 · Appellate court · Current

43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022)

AI and inventorship

Can AI be an inventor?

Human inventors only

Only a natural person can be an inventor under the US Patent Act

Why hereCoded at the pole: its core holding or recommendation answers the question outright.

Holding

Stephen Thaler named the AI system DABUS as sole inventor. The Federal Circuit held that an "individual" in the Patent Act means a human being, so an AI cannot be an inventor, and declined to reach broader questions because the statutory text was unambiguous.

The binding US answer on AI inventorship; the Supreme Court later declined review.

Principles it bears on

Sources

This record

Data as of 2026-10-21.

Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology

No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.