Decisions · Policy · United States
How generative AI turns copyright law upside down
Mark A. Lemley (Stanford Law School) · 2024-06 · Proposal · non-binding
Can AI-generated work be protected?
Closer to human authors only
Creativity moves into the prompt; the AI's share of the work will not be protected
What it says
Lemley argues generative AI strains the idea and expression distinction and the substantial similarity test. Creativity will increasingly lie in asking the right questions, while the AI does the bulk of the work copyright traditionally rewards, and that work will not be protected; copyright may need new ways to test infringement.
A leading voice on why the human-only rule leaves most AI output unprotected.
Sources
This record
Data as of 2026-10-21.
Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology
No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.