Decisions · Policy · United States
Authors and Machines
Jane C. Ginsburg and Luke Ali Budiardjo (Columbia Law School) · 2019 · Proposal · non-binding
Can AI-generated work be protected?
Only the human parts
Machines are never authors; the user or the designer may be, and some outputs are authorless
What it says
Applying a conception-and-execution model of authorship, the authors argue machines are faithful agents of humans, so asking whether a computer is an author is the wrong question. Depending on their contribution, either the user or the designer who trained the machine can be the author; where both are too remote, the work is authorless.
Whether you own AI-assisted work depends on how much you conceived and shaped it.
Sources
This record
Data as of 2026-10-21.
Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology
No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.