Decisions · Policy · United States
The machine as author
Daniel J. Gervais (Vanderbilt Law School) · 2020 · Proposal · non-binding
Can AI-generated work be protected?
Human authors only
Output without human creative choices belongs in the public domain
What it says
Gervais weighs the arguments for protecting AI-made literary and artistic material and finds them unpersuasive. Output that does not reflect human creative choices should stay in the public domain; he offers a test for human and machine collaborations, applied to three scenarios.
A leading statement that copyright's line should be drawn at human creative choice.
Sources
This record
Data as of 2026-10-21.
Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology
No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.