Decisions · Policy · European Union

Copyright and Generative AI: Opinion of the European Copyright Society

European Copyright Society (Dusollier, Kretschmer, Margoni, Mezei, Quintais, Rognstad) · 2025-02-07 · Proposal · non-binding

ECS Opinion, January 2025 (published 7 February 2025)

AI training and copyright

Can AI be trained on protected works?

Allowed with limits

Text and data mining exceptions cover some training steps, not the whole AI life cycle

Why hereAllowed with limits: the opinion reads the exceptions as covering some training steps but not the whole AI life cycle, and calls for rights reservation, transparency and remuneration to be weighed.

What it says

The opinion argues Articles 3 and 4 CDSM may cover some training operations but not every stage from dataset curation to user-prompted outputs, and calls for analysis of which acts and actors are involved, guided by authors' and performers' interests, users and the public, and innovation, including rights reservation, transparency and remuneration.

Leading EU copyright academics say current rules leave real gaps for AI.

Sources

This record

Data as of 2026-10-21.

Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology

No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.