Decisions · Court · Netherlands

DPG Media v. HowardsHome

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court of Amsterdam) · 2024-10-30 · First instance · Ongoing

Later historyAn appeal has been filed.

DPG Media, Mediahuis v Knowledge Exchange (HowardsHome), Rb. Amsterdam 30 October 2024

AI training and copyright

Can AI be trained on protected works?

Closer to freely allowed

A robots.txt that blocks named AI bots was not shown to be a general machine-readable opt-out

Why hereCloser to 'freely allowed': the court found a robots.txt naming specific AI bots was not a general machine-readable reservation against mining, so the opt-out was not shown.

Holding

Publishers sued a media-monitoring service that used their headlines, snippets and thumbnails. The court dismissed all claims: the limited use fell within the quotation and press review exception, and the publishers had not shown that their robots.txt, which excluded specific AI bots, was an express machine-readable reservation against text and data mining in general.

An early test of what a valid opt-out looks like under the EU data mining exception.

Sources

No official text linked yet: this summary relies on a secondary source. Verify against the original before citing.

This record

Data as of 2026-10-21.

Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology

No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.