Decisions · Court · Switzerland

DABUS (Swiss Federal Administrative Court)

Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland · 2025-06-26 · First instance · Current

Federal Administrative Court, judgment of 26 June 2025, B-2532/2024

AI and inventorship

Can AI be an inventor?

Human named, AI help allowed

AI can't be named, but the human who trained it and recognised the invention can be

Why hereHuman named, AI help allowed: DABUS could not be named, but Thaler could, because he supplied the data, trained the system and recognised the output as patentable.

Holding

The court refused to name DABUS as inventor, as only natural persons qualify. It accepted that Stephen Thaler could be named: he supplied the data, trained the system and recognised the output as patentable, which was enough human contribution. A person who merely uses an AI tool would not qualify.

Like Germany, Switzerland keeps AI-generated inventions patentable through a human inventor.

Principles it bears on

Sources

This record

Data as of 2026-10-21.

Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology

No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.