Decisions · Policy · United Kingdom
AI as Producer and Consumer of Copyright Works
Enrico Bonadio and Luke McDonagh (City St George's, University of London) · 2020 · Proposal · non-binding
Can AI-generated work be protected?
Closer to AI output protected
Not copyright, but a thin, short sui generis right (e.g. 3 years) for AI-generated works
What it says
Machines should not be authors or owners, and awarding copyright to humans via section 9(3) CDPA becomes less justifiable the more remote their intervention. Rather than overstretch copyright, the authors propose a sui generis right with a thin scope, a strict fair use or fair dealing backstop, and a very short term, around three years.
A middle path: some protection for AI output, far weaker and shorter than copyright.
Sources
This record
Data as of 2026-10-21.
Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology
No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.