Decisions · Policy · International

AIPPI Resolution Q272: Inventorship of inventions made using AI

AIPPI World Congress (online) · 2020-10-14 · Proposal · non-binding

AIPPI Resolution Q272 (2020)

AI and inventorship

Can AI be an inventor?

Human named, AI help allowed

An invention shouldn't lose patent protection just because AI contributed

Why hereHuman named, AI help allowed: an invention should not lose protection merely because AI contributed, with the inventor defined by intellectual contribution.

What it says

Building on AIPPI's definition of an inventor as a person who made an intellectual contribution to the inventive concept, the resolution holds that an invention should not be excluded from patent protection merely because an AI system contributed to it.

AI-assisted inventions remain patentable; the question is which human gets named.

Sources

No official text linked yet: this summary relies on a secondary source. Verify against the original before citing.

This record

Data as of 2026-10-21.

Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology

No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.