Decisions · Policy · United Kingdom

I think, therefore I invent: creative computers and the future of patent law

Ryan Abbott (University of Surrey) · 2016 · Proposal · non-binding

57 Boston College Law Review 1079 (2016)

AI and inventorship

Can AI be an inventor?

AI can be inventor

Computers that invent should be recognised as inventors

Why hereCoded at the pole: its core holding or recommendation answers the question outright.

What it says

Abbott argues that AI systems have been producing patentable inventions for decades and that patent law should recognise a computer as the inventor where it does the inventive work, with the patent owned by the machine's owner. Recognition would reward building creative machines and keep the record of inventorship honest.

The academic case behind the DABUS applications, which Abbott later led worldwide.

Sources

This record

Data as of 2026-10-21.

Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources linked above; not yet reviewed by a lawyer. Methodology

No changes logged yet. The change log started on 2026-10-20.