{ "name": "AI & IP Observatory", "publisher": "Havenmark IP", "version": "2026.10", "dataAsOf": "2026-10-21", "url": "https://www.havenmarkip.com/pro", "fields": { "id": "Stable identifier; the record's page is /pro/decisions/{id}", "title": "Short name of the decision, act or paper", "kind": "court, office, act or policy (non-binding proposals, studies and reports)", "body": "Court, office, legislature or authors", "jurisdiction": "Jurisdiction it belongs to", "region": "Region used for grouping", "date": "ISO date, or year-month when the day is uncertain", "citation": "Citation to look it up by", "issue": "The question it is coded on", "answer": "yes, partly, no, or none (takes no position)", "position": "Place on the question's five-point scale, from -1 (left pole) to 1 (right pole); empty when it takes no position", "level": "legislation, apex, appellate, first-instance, office, guidance or proposal", "status": "current, ongoing, narrowed or overruled", "source_group": "For papers: policymaker, academia or professional", "primary_url": "Official text, where one is linked", "source_url": "Secondary summary the entry was checked against", "reviewed": "Whether a lawyer has reviewed the record against the primary source" }, "records": [ { "id": "thaler-perlmutter-2025", "title": "Thaler v. Perlmutter", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-03-18", "citation": "Thaler v. Perlmutter (D.C. Cir. 2025), affirming D.D.C. 2023", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2025/03/23-5233.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/03/appellate-court-affirms-human-authorship", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "zarya-of-the-dawn-2023", "title": "Zarya of the Dawn", "kind": "office", "body": "U.S. Copyright Office", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-02-21", "citation": "U.S. Copyright Office decision letter, 21 Feb 2023", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "office", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.copyright.gov/docs/zarya-of-the-dawn.pdf", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "star-athletica-2017", "title": "Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2017-03-22", "citation": "580 U.S. 405 (2017)", "issue": "design-copyright", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/15-866", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "thomson-reuters-ross-2025", "title": "Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-02-11", "citation": "No. 1:20-cv-613 (D. Del. 2025)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17131648/thomson-reuters-enterprise-centre-gmbh-v-ross-intelligence-inc/", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-uksc-2023", "title": "Thaler v. Comptroller-General (DABUS)", "kind": "court", "body": "UK Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2023-12-20", "citation": "[2023] UKSC 49", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/uksc/2023/49", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "getty-stability-2025", "title": "Getty Images v. Stability AI", "kind": "court", "body": "High Court of England and Wales", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2025-11-04", "citation": "[2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch)", "issue": "model-copy", "answer": "no", "position": -0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/ch/2025/2863", "source_url": "https://www.aippi.org/news/getty-images-v-stability-ai-uk-high-court-finds-no-secondary-copyright-infringement-in-landmark-genai-ruling/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-epo-2021", "title": "DABUS (J 8/20)", "kind": "office", "body": "European Patent Office, Legal Board of Appeal", "jurisdiction": "European Patent Organisation", "region": "Europe", "date": "2021-12-21", "citation": "J 8/20 and J 9/20", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "office", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.epo.org/en/boards-of-appeal/decisions/j200008eu1", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-bgh-2024", "title": "DABUS (Federal Court of Justice)", "kind": "court", "body": "Bundesgerichtshof (German Federal Court of Justice)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024-06-11", "citation": "BGH, Beschluss v. 11.06.2024, X ZB 5/22, ECLI:DE:BGH:2024:110624BXZB5.22.0", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://gesetze.co/urteile/X_ZB_5-22", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "kneschke-laion-2024", "title": "Kneschke v. LAION", "kind": "court", "body": "Landgericht Hamburg (Regional Court)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024-09-27", "citation": "310 O 227/23", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/2381", "source_url": "https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/blogs/mse-today/2025/robert-kneschke-v-laion", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "gema-openai-2025", "title": "GEMA v. OpenAI", "kind": "court", "body": "Landgericht München I (Regional Court)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-11-11", "citation": "LG München I, 42 O 14139/24", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/3889", "source_url": "https://www.taylorwessing.com/de/insights-and-events/insights/2025/11/gema-v-openai", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "cofemel-2019", "title": "Cofemel v. G-Star Raw", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2019-09-12", "citation": "C-683/17", "issue": "design-copyright", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0683", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "eu-dsm-directive-2019", "title": "DSM Directive, Articles 3-4", "kind": "act", "body": "European Parliament and Council", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2019-04-17", "citation": "Directive (EU) 2019/790", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "eu-ai-act-2024", "title": "EU AI Act", "kind": "act", "body": "European Parliament and Council", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024-08-01", "citation": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "li-liu-2023", "title": "Li v. Liu", "kind": "court", "body": "Beijing Internet Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2023-11-27", "citation": "(2023) Jing 0491 Min Chu No. 11279", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/copyright-blog/beijing-internet-court-grants-copyright-to-ai-generated-image-for-the-first-time/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "japan-30-4", "title": "Copyright Act, Article 30-4", "kind": "act", "body": "National Diet of Japan", "jurisdiction": "Japan", "region": "Japan", "date": "2019-01-01", "citation": "Copyright Act Art. 30-4 (2018 amendment)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/4207", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "singapore-s244-2021", "title": "Copyright Act 2021, section 244 (computational data analysis)", "kind": "act", "body": "Parliament of Singapore", "jurisdiction": "Singapore", "region": "Singapore", "date": "2021-11-21", "citation": "Copyright Act 2021 (Singapore), ss 243 to 244, with s 187 (contract override)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CA2021?ProvIds=pr244-", "source_url": "https://rouse.com/insights/news/2024/artificial-intelligence-in-singapore-copyright-infringement-defence-for-artificial-intelligence-machine-learning", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "uk-cdpa-s29a", "title": "CDPA section 29A (text and data analysis for non-commercial research)", "kind": "act", "body": "UK Parliament", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2014-06-01", "citation": "Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 29A (inserted 2014)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/29A", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "china-genai-interim-measures-2023", "title": "Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services", "kind": "act", "body": "Cyberspace Administration of China, with six other authorities", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2023-08-15", "citation": "生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures), in force 15 August 2023, Art. 7", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm", "source_url": "https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/generative-ai-interim/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "hong-kong-tdm-proposal-2024", "title": "Hong Kong consultation: text and data mining exception", "kind": "policy", "body": "Commerce and Economic Development Bureau and Intellectual Property Department, Hong Kong SAR", "jurisdiction": "Hong Kong", "region": "China", "date": "2024-07-08", "citation": "Public consultation paper on copyright and artificial intelligence, 8 July 2024", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.ipd.gov.hk/filemanager/ipd/en/share/consultation-papers/Eng-Copyright-and-AI-Consultation-Paper-20240708.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/hong-kong-launches-public-consultation-on-ai-and-copyright-law", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ukraine-sui-generis-2023", "title": "Law on Copyright and Related Rights, Article 33 (sui generis right for AI output)", "kind": "act", "body": "Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine", "jurisdiction": "Ukraine", "region": "Europe", "date": "2023-01-01", "citation": "Law of Ukraine No. 2811-IX of 1 December 2022, Art. 33, in force 1 January 2023", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/22385", "source_url": "https://www.aippi.org/news/sui-generis-how-ai-generated-works-are-protected-in-ukraine-and-beyond/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-au-2022", "title": "Commissioner of Patents v. Thaler (DABUS)", "kind": "court", "body": "Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia", "jurisdiction": "Australia", "region": "Australia", "date": "2022-04-13", "citation": "Commissioner of Patents v Thaler [2022] FCAFC 62", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2022/2022fcafc0062", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-za-2021", "title": "DABUS patent grant", "kind": "office", "body": "Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC)", "jurisdiction": "South Africa", "region": "South Africa", "date": "2021-07", "citation": "ZA 2021/03242", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "office", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://spoor.com/dabus-the-rise-of-the-inventive-machines/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "naruto-slater-2018", "title": "Naruto v. Slater (monkey selfie)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2018-04-23", "citation": "888 F.3d 418 (9th Cir. 2018)", "issue": "non-human-author", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/04/23/16-15469.pdf", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "louboutin-cjeu-2018", "title": "Louboutin v. Van Haren", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2018-06-12", "citation": "C-163/16", "issue": "colour-shape-marks", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62016CJ0163", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "louboutin-ysl-2012", "title": "Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2012-09-05", "citation": "696 F.3d 206 (2d Cir. 2012)", "issue": "colour-shape-marks", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "qualitex-1995", "title": "Qualitex v. Jacobson Products", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "1995-03-28", "citation": "514 U.S. 159 (1995)", "issue": "colour-shape-marks", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/514/159", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "cadbury-purple-2013", "title": "Société des Produits Nestlé v. Cadbury (purple)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Appeal of England and Wales", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2013-10-04", "citation": "[2013] EWCA Civ 1174", "issue": "colour-shape-marks", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2013/1174", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "lego-brick-2010", "title": "Lego Juris v. OHIM (Lego brick)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2010-09-14", "citation": "C-48/09 P", "issue": "colour-shape-marks", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62009CJ0048", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "kitkat-2018", "title": "Mondelez v. Nestlé (KitKat shape)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2018-07-25", "citation": "C-84/17 P", "issue": "colour-shape-marks", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0084", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "messi-2020", "title": "Messi v. EUIPO", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2020-09-17", "citation": "C-449/18 P and C-474/18 P", "issue": "personal-name-marks", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0449", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "big-mac-2019", "title": "Supermac's v. McDonald's (BIG MAC)", "kind": "office", "body": "EUIPO Cancellation Division", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2019-01-11", "citation": "EUIPO Cancellation Division decision, 11 Jan 2019", "issue": "non-use", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "office", "status": "narrowed", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "jack-daniels-2023", "title": "Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-06-08", "citation": "599 U.S. 140 (2023)", "issue": "parody", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/22-148", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "metabirkins-2023", "title": "Hermès v. Rothschild (MetaBirkins)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (jury)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-02-08", "citation": "No. 1:22-cv-00384 (S.D.N.Y.)", "issue": "parody", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://itsartlaw.org/case-review/case-review-hermes-v-rothschild/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "infopaq-2009", "title": "Infopaq v. Danske Dagblades Forening", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2009-07-16", "citation": "C-5/08", "issue": "originality", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62008CJ0005", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "feist-1991", "title": "Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "1991-03-27", "citation": "499 U.S. 340 (1991)", "issue": "originality", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/499/340", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "warhol-goldsmith-2023", "title": "Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-05-18", "citation": "598 U.S. 508 (2023)", "issue": "transformative-use", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/21-869", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "pelham-2019", "title": "Pelham v. Hütter (Kraftwerk sample)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2019-07-29", "citation": "C-476/17", "issue": "music-similarity", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0476", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "sheeran-us-2023", "title": "Griffin v. Sheeran (Thinking Out Loud)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (jury)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-05-04", "citation": "S.D.N.Y. jury verdict, 4 May 2023", "issue": "music-similarity", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "sheeran-uk-2022", "title": "Sheeran v. Chokri (Shape of You)", "kind": "court", "body": "High Court of England and Wales", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2022-04-06", "citation": "[2022] EWHC 827 (Ch)", "issue": "music-similarity", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "renckhoff-2018", "title": "Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v. Renckhoff", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2018-08-07", "citation": "C-161/17", "issue": "reposting-online", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0161", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "brompton-2020", "title": "Brompton Bicycle v. Chedech/Get2Get", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2020-06-11", "citation": "C-833/18", "issue": "design-copyright", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0833", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "karen-millen-2014", "title": "Karen Millen v. Dunnes Stores", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2014-06-19", "citation": "C-345/13", "issue": "unregistered-design", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0345", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "thaler-cert-denied-2026", "title": "Thaler v. Perlmutter (certiorari denied)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2026-03-02", "citation": "No. 25-449 (cert. denied)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-449.html", "source_url": "https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/thaler-v-perlmutter/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "american-cheese-2025", "title": "A Single Piece of American Cheese", "kind": "office", "body": "U.S. Copyright Office", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-01-30", "citation": "U.S. Copyright Office registration, 30 Jan 2025 (Invoke)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "office", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jsel/2025/03/u-s-copyright-office-grants-registration-to-ai-generated-artwork/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "prague-ai-image-2023", "title": "S.Š. v. TAUBEL LEGAL (AI image)", "kind": "court", "body": "Municipal Court in Prague", "jurisdiction": "Czech Republic", "region": "Europe", "date": "2023-10-11", "citation": "Městský soud v Praze, judgment of 11 Oct 2023", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://cms.law/en/sau/publication/artificial-intelligence-and-copyright-case-tracker/czech-republic-s.-s.-v-taubel-legal-advokatni-kancelar-s.r.o", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "changshu-2025", "title": "Changshu 'half heart' case", "kind": "court", "body": "Changshu People's Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2025-03-07", "citation": "Changshu People's Court, announced 7 Mar 2025", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.dlapiper.com/en-at/insights/publications/2025/05/another-chinese-court-finds-that-ai-generated-images-can-be-protected-by-copyright", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "zhangjiagang-2025", "title": "Zhangjiagang AI chair images case", "kind": "court", "body": "Zhangjiagang People's Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2025-03", "citation": "Zhangjiagang People's Court, March 2025", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.iam-media.com/article/chinese-court-denies-copyright-protection-ai-generated-content-insufficient-human-input-in-first-of-its-kind-ruling", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "beijing-internet-court-2025", "title": "Zhou v. (Beijing Internet Court, 2025)", "kind": "court", "body": "Beijing Internet Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2025-09-16", "citation": "Beijing Internet Court, announced 16 Sep 2025 (upheld on appeal)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://chinaiplawupdate.com/2025/09/beijing-internet-court-requires-evidence-of-creative-effort-to-claim-copyright-protection-in-ai-generated-images/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "korea-ai-guidelines", "title": "Copyright guidelines on generative AI", "kind": "office", "body": "Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism / Korea Copyright Commission", "jurisdiction": "South Korea", "region": "South Korea", "date": "2023-12", "citation": "Korean government AI copyright guidelines (2023, updated 2025)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "guidance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.ip.kimchang.com/en/insights/detail.kc?sch_section=4&idx=32927", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ultraman-guangzhou-2024", "title": "Ultraman case", "kind": "court", "body": "Guangzhou Internet Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2024-02-08", "citation": "Guangzhou Internet Court, judgment of 8 Feb 2024", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://cm.twobirds.com/en/insights/2024/china/liability-of-ai-service-providers-for-copyright-infringement", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "bartz-anthropic-2025", "title": "Bartz v. Anthropic", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-06-23", "citation": "N.D. Cal., order of 23 Jun 2025 (Alsup, J.)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/3891", "source_url": "https://www.debevoise.com/insights/publications/2025/06/anthropic-and-meta-decisions-on-fair-use", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "kadrey-meta-2025", "title": "Kadrey v. Meta", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-06-25", "citation": "N.D. Cal., order of 25 Jun 2025 (Chhabria, J.)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/3892", "source_url": "https://www.debevoise.com/insights/publications/2025/06/anthropic-and-meta-decisions-on-fair-use", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "thomson-reuters-ross-3d-2026", "title": "Thomson Reuters v. Ross (appeal)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2026-09-29", "citation": "Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc. (3d Cir. 2026)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10988837/thomson-reuters-enterprise-centre-gmbh-v-ross-intelligence-inc/", "source_url": "https://www.lawnext.com/2026/10/no-more-than-an-ordinary-copyright-case-3rd-circuit-unseals-its-opinion-in-thomson-reuters-case-against-ross.html", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "kneschke-laion-olg-2025", "title": "Kneschke v. LAION (appeal)", "kind": "court", "body": "Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Higher Regional Court)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-12-10", "citation": "5 U 104/24", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "appellate", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://cm.twobirds.com/en/insights/2025/germany/higher-regional-court-hamburg-confirms-ai-training-was-permitted-(kneschke-v,-d-,-laion)", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ani-openai-2026", "title": "ANI v. OpenAI (interim order)", "kind": "court", "body": "Delhi High Court", "jurisdiction": "India", "region": "India", "date": "2026-07-24", "citation": "Delhi High Court, interim order of 24 Jul 2026", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/3893", "source_url": "https://intellectual-property-helpdesk.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/delhi-high-court-rules-anis-copyright-claims-against-openai-2026-07-28_en", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "japan-general-understanding-2024", "title": "General Understanding on AI and Copyright", "kind": "office", "body": "Agency for Cultural Affairs (Legal Subcommittee)", "jurisdiction": "Japan", "region": "Japan", "date": "2024-03-15", "citation": "Agency for Cultural Affairs, 15 Mar 2024", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "guidance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.bunka.go.jp/english/policy/copyright/pdf/94055801_01.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/office-japan/docs-en-tatsuhiro-ueno_general-understanding-on-ai-and-copyright-in-japan_set.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "big-mac-general-court-2024", "title": "Supermac's v. EUIPO (BIG MAC)", "kind": "court", "body": "General Court of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024-06-05", "citation": "T-58/23", "issue": "non-use", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62023TJ0058", "source_url": "https://ieu-monitoring.com/editorial/eu-general-court-mcdonalds-loses-eu-trade-mark-big-mac-in-respect-to-poultry-products/435846/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "qiaodan-jordan-2016", "title": "Michael Jordan v. Qiaodan Sports", "kind": "court", "body": "Supreme People's Court of China", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2016-12-08", "citation": "Supreme People's Court, judgments of 8 Dec 2016", "issue": "personal-name-marks", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-supreme-peoples-court-of-chinas.html", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "katie-perry-hca-2026", "title": "Taylor v. Killer Queen (Katie Perry v. Katy Perry)", "kind": "court", "body": "High Court of Australia", "jurisdiction": "Australia", "region": "Australia", "date": "2026-03-11", "citation": "[2026] HCA 5", "issue": "personal-name-marks", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/no-fireworks-katy-perry-australian-high-court-restores-katie-perry-trademark", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "japan-colour-marks-2017", "title": "First colour-only trademarks (Tombow MONO, 7-Eleven)", "kind": "office", "body": "Japan Patent Office", "jurisdiction": "Japan", "region": "Japan", "date": "2017-03-01", "citation": "JPO registrations announced 1 Mar 2017", "issue": "colour-shape-marks", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "office", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://blog.marks-iplaw.jp/2017/03/03/first-color-mark-registration/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "thj-sheridan-2023", "title": "THJ Systems v. Sheridan", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Appeal of England and Wales", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2023-11-20", "citation": "[2023] EWCA Civ 1354", "issue": "originality", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1354", "source_url": "https://www.fieldfisher.com/en/services/intellectual-property/intellectual-property-blog/originality-in-the-uk-means-the-author-s-own-intellectual-creation-including-for-software-generated-works-the-debate-is-over-for-now", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "lucasfilm-ainsworth-2011", "title": "Lucasfilm v. Ainsworth (Stormtrooper helmet)", "kind": "court", "body": "UK Supreme Court", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2011-07-27", "citation": "[2011] UKSC 39", "issue": "design-copyright", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/uksc/2011/39", "source_url": "https://cms.law/en/gbr/legal-updates/star-wars-episode-iv-a-new-hope", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "tripp-trapp-iphc-2015", "title": "Stokke v. Katoji (Tripp Trapp chair)", "kind": "court", "body": "IP High Court of Japan", "jurisdiction": "Japan", "region": "Japan", "date": "2015-04-14", "citation": "Case 2014 (Ne) 10063", "issue": "design-copyright", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "appellate", "status": "narrowed", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.jpaa.or.jp/en/img/ip-information/court-decisions/84_TRIPP%20TRAPP%20case.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "tripp-trapp-sc-2026", "title": "Tripp Trapp chair (Supreme Court)", "kind": "court", "body": "Supreme Court of Japan", "jurisdiction": "Japan", "region": "Japan", "date": "2026-04-24", "citation": "Reiwa 7 (Ju) 356", "issue": "design-copyright", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://marks-iplaw.jp/supreme-court-tripp-trapp/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "deckmyn-2014", "title": "Deckmyn v. Vandersteen (parody)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2014-09-03", "citation": "C-201/13", "issue": "transformative-use", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0201", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "funke-medien-2019", "title": "Funke Medien v. Germany", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2019-07-29", "citation": "C-469/17", "issue": "transformative-use", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0469", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "svensson-2014", "title": "Svensson v. Retriever Sverige", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2014-02-13", "citation": "C-466/12", "issue": "reposting-online", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62012CJ0466", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "gs-media-2016", "title": "GS Media v. Sanoma (Playboy photos)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2016-09-08", "citation": "C-160/15", "issue": "reposting-online", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62015CJ0160", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "cdpa-s9-3", "title": "CDPA 1988, section 9(3): computer-generated works", "kind": "act", "body": "UK Parliament", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "1988-11-15", "citation": "Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 9(3)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/9", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "cdpa-s30a-2014", "title": "CDPA 1988, section 30A: caricature, parody or pastiche", "kind": "act", "body": "UK Parliament", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2014-10-01", "citation": "Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, s 30A", "issue": "transformative-use", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/30A", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "perfect-10-amazon-2007", "title": "Perfect 10 v. Amazon (server test)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2007-12-03", "citation": "508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007)", "issue": "reposting-online", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/intellectual-property/to-link-or-not-to-link/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "goldman-breitbart-2018", "title": "Goldman v. Breitbart (embedded tweet)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2018-02-15", "citation": "302 F. Supp. 3d 585 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)", "issue": "reposting-online", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.proskauer.com/blog/new-york-court-rebuffs-ninth-circuits-copyright-server-test-finds-embedded-tweet-displaying-copyrighted-image-to-be-infringement", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "painer-2011", "title": "Painer v. Standard Verlags", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the European Union", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2011-12-01", "citation": "C-145/10", "issue": "non-human-author", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0145", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "max-planck-ai-rights-2026", "title": "Max Planck position statement on copyright and generative AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Drexl, Militsyna, Dagan)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2026-06-25", "citation": "GRUR International (2026), doi 10.1093/grurint/ikag093", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikag093", "source_url": "https://www.ip.mpg.de/en/research/research-news/copyright-in-the-age-of-ai.html", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ep-study-genai-2025", "title": "European Parliament study: Generative AI and Copyright", "kind": "policy", "body": "European Parliament, Policy Department (requested by the JURI Committee)", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-07-09", "citation": "PE 774.095", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IUST_STU(2025)774095", "source_url": "https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/08/european-parliaments-new-study-on-generative-ai-and-copyright-calls-for-overhaul-of-optout-regime", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ep-resolution-genai-2026", "title": "European Parliament resolution on copyright and generative AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "European Parliament (rapporteur Axel Voss)", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2026-03-10", "citation": "P10_TA(2026)0066, 2025/2058(INI); adopted 460 to 71, 88 abstentions", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2026-0066_EN.html", "source_url": "https://merlin.obs.coe.int/article/10499", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "usco-part3-training-2025", "title": "Copyright and AI, Part 3: Generative AI Training", "kind": "policy", "body": "U.S. Copyright Office", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-05-09", "citation": "Pre-publication report, 9 May 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.copyright.gov/policy/artificial-intelligence/index.html", "source_url": "https://authorsguild.org/news/us-copyright-office-ai-report-part-3-what-authors-should-know/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "uk-copyright-ai-report-2026", "title": "UK Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence", "kind": "policy", "body": "UK Government (under the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025)", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2026-03-18", "citation": "Report under s 136 Data (Use and Access) Act 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/artificial-intelligence-and-ip-copyright-and-patents", "source_url": "https://www.mishcon.com/news/government-publishes-progress-report-on-copyright-and-ai", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "cambridge-ai-copyright-2025", "title": "AI, Copyright, and Productivity in the Creative Industries", "kind": "policy", "body": "University of Cambridge (Minderoo Centre, Bennett Institute, ai@cam)", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2025-02-20", "citation": "Policy brief, 20 February 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://www.ai.cam.ac.uk/reports/policy-brief-ai-copyright-and-productivity-in-the-creative-industries/", "source_url": "https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/forcing-uk-creatives-to-opt-out-of-ai-training-risks-stifling-new-talent-cambridge-experts-warn", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "euipo-genai-study-2025", "title": "The Development of Generative AI from a Copyright Perspective", "kind": "policy", "body": "EUIPO (with the European Commission)", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-05", "citation": "EUIPO study, May 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.2814/3893780", "source_url": "https://ecta.org/en/latest-news-detail/news-973/euipo-releases-study-on-generative-ai-and-copyright/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "aippi-q295-2025", "title": "AIPPI Resolution Q295: Copyright and AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "AIPPI World Congress, Yokohama", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2025-09", "citation": "AIPPI Resolution Q295 (2025)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "https://www.aippi.org/news/aippi-adopts-four-important-resolutions-at-the-2025-yokohama-world-congress/", "source_url": "https://www.arochilindner.com/en/al-newsletter-copyright-and-artificial-intelligence-analysis-of-aippi-resolution-q295/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "aippi-ai-works-2019", "title": "AIPPI Resolution: Copyright in artificially generated works", "kind": "policy", "body": "AIPPI World Congress, London", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2019-09", "citation": "AIPPI Resolution, World Congress London, adopted 18 September 2019", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "https://www.aippi.org/content/uploads/2022/11/Resolution_Copyright_in_artificially_generated_works_English.pdf", "source_url": "https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/copyright-blog/aippi-no-copyright-protection-for-ai-works-without-human-input-but-related-rights-remain/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "aippi-q272-2020", "title": "AIPPI Resolution Q272: Inventorship of inventions made using AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "AIPPI World Congress (online)", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2020-10-14", "citation": "AIPPI Resolution Q272 (2020)", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://ukrpatent.org/atachs/aippi-resolution-invention-ai-2020.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "wipo-sccr-genai-2025", "title": "WIPO information sessions on copyright and generative AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR/46, SCCR/47)", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2025-12-04", "citation": "SCCR/46 (10 Apr 2025) and SCCR/47 (4 Dec 2025)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_47/sccr_47_inf_2_rev.pdf", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "wipo-conversation-2025", "title": "WIPO Conversation on IP and Frontier Technologies (11th session)", "kind": "policy", "body": "World Intellectual Property Organization", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2025-04-23", "citation": "WIPO Conversation, 11th session, 23 to 24 April 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/frontier-technologies/frontier_conversation", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "bonadio-mcdonagh-2020", "title": "AI as Producer and Consumer of Copyright Works", "kind": "policy", "body": "Enrico Bonadio and Luke McDonagh (City St George's, University of London)", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2020", "citation": "Intellectual Property Quarterly 2020(2), pp. 112 to 137", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/23951/", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "senftleben-2023", "title": "Generative AI and Author Remuneration", "kind": "policy", "body": "Martin Senftleben (Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam)", "jurisdiction": "Netherlands", "region": "Europe", "date": "2023", "citation": "IIC 54 (2023), pp. 1535 to 1560", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01399-4", "source_url": "https://ip.jotwell.com/?p=2684", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "geiger-iaia-2024", "title": "The Forgotten Creator: A Statutory Remuneration Right for Machine Learning", "kind": "policy", "body": "Christophe Geiger and Vincenzo Iaia (LUISS Guido Carli University)", "jurisdiction": "Italy", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024", "citation": "Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 52 (2024), 105925, doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105925", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105925", "source_url": "https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ibil/events/2025/jul/fair-remuneration-creators-core-principle-copyright-what-consequence-genai", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ecs-opinion-genai-2025", "title": "Copyright and Generative AI: Opinion of the European Copyright Society", "kind": "policy", "body": "European Copyright Society (Dusollier, Kretschmer, Margoni, Mezei, Quintais, Rognstad)", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-02-07", "citation": "ECS Opinion, January 2025 (published 7 February 2025)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://www.create.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ECS_Opinion_GenAI_7Feb2025.pdf", "source_url": "https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/copyright-blog/european-copyright-society-opinion-on-copyright-and-generative-ai/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "quintais-2025", "title": "Generative AI, Copyright and the AI Act", "kind": "policy", "body": "João Pedro Quintais (Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam)", "jurisdiction": "Netherlands", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025", "citation": "Computer Law & Security Review (2025), art. 106107", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4912701", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "lemley-casey-2021", "title": "Fair Learning", "kind": "policy", "body": "Mark A. Lemley and Bryan Casey (Stanford Law School)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2021", "citation": "Texas Law Review, vol. 99 (2021)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://texaslawreview.org/fair-learning/", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "guadamuz-2025", "title": "Guadamuz: UK creatives should back AI training at home", "kind": "policy", "body": "Andres Guadamuz (University of Sussex)", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2025-10", "citation": "Interview, TechRepublic, October 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-uk-creatives-back-ai-training-uk-creatives-law-professor/", "source_url": "https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-uk-creatives-back-ai-training-uk-creatives-law-professor/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "india-dpiit-2025", "title": "DPIIT working paper on generative AI and copyright (Part 1)", "kind": "policy", "body": "Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Government of India", "jurisdiction": "India", "region": "India", "date": "2025-12-08", "citation": "DPIIT working paper, 8 December 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.medianama.com/2025/12/223-dpiit-committee-mandatory-ai-licensing-model-royalties-no-opt-out-creators/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "australia-no-tdm-2025", "title": "Australia rules out a text and data mining exception", "kind": "policy", "body": "Australian Government (Attorney-General)", "jurisdiction": "Australia", "region": "Australia", "date": "2025-10-26", "citation": "Attorney-General media release, 26 October 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://cm.twobirds.com/en/insights/2025/australia/3-key-takeaways-from-australia's-latest-ai-copyright-law-reform-announcement", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "france-darcos-bill-2026", "title": "Darcos bill: presumption of use of works by AI providers", "kind": "policy", "body": "French Senate", "jurisdiction": "France", "region": "Europe", "date": "2026-04-08", "citation": "Bill adopted unanimously by the Senate, 8 April 2026", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.senat.fr/leg/tas25-085.html", "source_url": "https://www.britishcopyright.org/rightsholders-gain-a-significantly-stronger-litigation-position-as-frances-senate-unanimously-adopts-the-bill-introducing-a-presumption-of-use-of-cultural-content-by-ai-providers/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "us-train-act", "title": "TRAIN Act", "kind": "policy", "body": "U.S. Congress (Sen. Welch; bipartisan reintroduction 2026)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2026-02", "citation": "S. 5379 (2024); reintroduced in House and Senate, February 2026", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-118s5379is/html/BILLS-118s5379is.htm", "source_url": "https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/ai-law-and-regulation-tracker/sen-welch-introduces-bill-to-increase-transparency-of-ai-training-data", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "us-disclosure-act-2024", "title": "Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act", "kind": "policy", "body": "U.S. House of Representatives (Rep. Schiff)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2024-04", "citation": "H.R. 7913 (2024)", "issue": "ai-transparency", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-118hr7913ih/html/BILLS-118hr7913ih.htm", "source_url": "https://copyrightalliance.org/copyright-congress-2024/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ec-call-for-evidence-2026", "title": "European Commission call for evidence on copyright and generative AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "European Commission", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2026-05-13", "citation": "Ares(2026)4845636, 13 May 2026", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-seeks-views-review-eu-copyright-rules", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikag093", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ginsburg-budiardjo-2019", "title": "Authors and Machines", "kind": "policy", "body": "Jane C. Ginsburg and Luke Ali Budiardjo (Columbia Law School)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2019", "citation": "Berkeley Technology Law Journal, vol. 34, p. 343 (2019)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://btlj.org/data/articles2019/34_2/01_Ginsburg_Web.pdf", "source_url": "https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2593", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "samuelson-2023", "title": "Generative AI meets copyright", "kind": "policy", "body": "Pamela Samuelson (UC Berkeley School of Law)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-07-14", "citation": "Science, vol. 381, issue 6654, pp. 158 to 161 (2023)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0656", "source_url": "https://news.berkeley.edu/2023/05/16/generative-ai-meets-copyright-law", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "geist-2024", "title": "Canadian copyright in the age of generative AI (consultation submission)", "kind": "policy", "body": "Michael Geist (University of Ottawa)", "jurisdiction": "Canada", "region": "Canada", "date": "2024-01", "citation": "Submission to the Government of Canada's consultation on copyright and generative AI, January 2024", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://www.michaelgeist.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Geistgenerativeaicopyrightsubmission.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2024/01/canadian-copyright-in-the-age-of-generative-ai-my-submission-to-the-governments-copyright-consultation/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "gucluturk-2021", "title": "Lawful use of data in machine learning-based AI under Turkish law (doctoral thesis)", "kind": "policy", "body": "Osman Gazi Güçlütürk (Galatasaray University)", "jurisdiction": "Türkiye", "region": "Türkiye", "date": "2021", "citation": "Türk hukukunda makine öğrenmesine dayalı yapay zekada verinin hukuka uygun şekilde kullanılması, PhD thesis, Galatasaray University, 2021 (YÖK thesis no. 702185)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=RjZwH00oMG4iNa5Sgvlgg8baie-30UxYwrOM2x3YO4X1S9vYbIb4yysCqiszcRJO", "source_url": "https://tezara.org/theses/702185", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "yilmaztekin-2023", "title": "Artificial Intelligence, Design Law and Fashion (book)", "kind": "policy", "body": "Hasan Kadir Yılmaztekin (Justice Academy of Türkiye)", "jurisdiction": "Türkiye", "region": "Türkiye", "date": "2022-12", "citation": "Hasan Kadir Yılmaztekin, Artificial Intelligence, Design Law and Fashion, Routledge Research in Fashion Law, Routledge 2023", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003355922/artificial-intelligence-design-law-fashion-hasan-kadir-y%C4%B1lmaztekin", "source_url": "https://www.routledge.com/Artificial-Intelligence-Design-Law-and-Fashion/Yilmaztekin/p/book/9781032410364", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ozkan-uner-caglayan-aksoy-2025", "title": "Navigating AI and copyright law in the UK: legal frontiers and emerging regulatory perspectives (book chapter)", "kind": "policy", "body": "Zehra Özkan Üner (Ankara University) and Pınar Çağlayan Aksoy (Bilkent University)", "jurisdiction": "Türkiye", "region": "Türkiye", "date": "2025-04", "citation": "In Legal and Economic Perspectives on the Nexus of AI and Copyright, IGI Global 2025, pp. 49-70, doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8704-7.ch003", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8704-7.ch003", "source_url": "https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/navigating-ai-and-copyright-law-in-the-uk/374316", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "abbott-2016", "title": "I think, therefore I invent: creative computers and the future of patent law", "kind": "policy", "body": "Ryan Abbott (University of Surrey)", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2016", "citation": "57 Boston College Law Review 1079 (2016)", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727884", "source_url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2727884", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "gervais-2020", "title": "The machine as author", "kind": "policy", "body": "Daniel J. Gervais (Vanderbilt Law School)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2020", "citation": "105 Iowa Law Review 2053 (2020)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/sites/ilr.law.uiowa.edu/files/2023-02/Gervais.pdf", "source_url": "https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-105-issue-5/the-machine-as-author", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "hugenholtz-quintais-2021", "title": "Copyright and artificial creation: does EU copyright law protect AI-assisted output?", "kind": "policy", "body": "P. Bernt Hugenholtz and João Pedro Quintais (Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam)", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2021", "citation": "52 IIC 1190 (2021), doi:10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0", "source_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "craig-kerr-2021", "title": "The death of the AI author", "kind": "policy", "body": "Carys Craig (Osgoode Hall Law School) and Ian Kerr (University of Ottawa)", "jurisdiction": "Canada", "region": "Canada", "date": "2021", "citation": "52(1) Ottawa Law Review 33 (2021)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/2985", "source_url": "https://www.iankerr.ca/blog/2019/6/14/the-death-of-the-ai-author", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "kim-2020", "title": "'AI-generated inventions': time to get the record straight?", "kind": "policy", "body": "Daria Kim (Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2020", "citation": "69 GRUR International 443 (2020), doi:10.1093/grurint/ikaa061", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa061", "source_url": "https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/69/5/443/5854752", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dornis-stober-2024", "title": "Copyright and the training of generative AI models (Urheberrecht und Training generativer KI-Modelle)", "kind": "policy", "body": "Tim W. Dornis (Leibniz University Hannover) and Sebastian Stober (University of Magdeburg)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024", "citation": "Nomos, Recht und Digitalisierung vol. 19, 2024 (open access)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783748949558", "source_url": "https://urheber.info/media/pages/diskurs/ki-training-ist-urheberrechtsverletzung/8c84603662-1725528121/240905_iu_pressemitteilung_studie_ki-training-urheberrechtsverletzung.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "kop-2019", "title": "AI and intellectual property: towards an articulated public domain", "kind": "policy", "body": "Mauritz Kop (Stanford Law School, Transatlantic Technology Law Forum)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2019", "citation": "SSRN 3409715 (2019)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409715", "source_url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3409715", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "sag-2023", "title": "Copyright safety for generative AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "Matthew Sag (Emory University School of Law)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023", "citation": "61 Houston Law Review 295 (2023); SSRN 4438593", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4438593", "source_url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4438593", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "lee-2024", "title": "Prompting progress: authorship in the age of AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "Edward Lee (Chicago-Kent College of Law)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023", "citation": "SSRN 4609687 (2023)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4609687", "source_url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4609687", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ueno-2021", "title": "The flexible copyright exception for 'non-enjoyment' purposes: recent amendment in Japan and its implication", "kind": "policy", "body": "Tatsuhiro Ueno (Waseda University)", "jurisdiction": "Japan", "region": "Japan", "date": "2021", "citation": "70 GRUR International 145 (2021), doi:10.1093/grurint/ikaa184", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa184", "source_url": "https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/70/2/145/6102831", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "margoni-kretschmer-2022", "title": "A deeper look into the EU text and data mining exceptions: harmonisation, data ownership, and the future of technology", "kind": "policy", "body": "Thomas Margoni (KU Leuven) and Martin Kretschmer (University of Glasgow, CREATe)", "jurisdiction": "United Kingdom", "region": "United Kingdom", "date": "2022", "citation": "71 GRUR International 685 (2022), doi:10.1093/grurint/ikac054 (open access)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac054", "source_url": "https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/71/8/685/6650009", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "sag-yu-2025", "title": "The globalization of copyright exceptions for AI training", "kind": "policy", "body": "Matthew Sag (Emory University) and Peter K. Yu (Texas A&M University)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025", "citation": "74 Emory Law Journal 1163 (2025)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol74/iss5/4/", "source_url": "https://matthewsag.com/the-globalization-of-copyright-exceptions-for-ai-training/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "cooper-grimmelmann-2025", "title": "The Files are in the Computer: Copyright, Memorization, and Generative AI", "kind": "policy", "body": "A. Feder Cooper and James Grimmelmann (Cornell University)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025", "citation": "Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 100 (2025); arXiv:2404.12590", "issue": "model-copy", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12590", "source_url": "https://3d.laboratorium.net/2024-07-23-the-files-are-in-the-computer", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "flynn-et-al-2020", "title": "Implementing user rights for research in the field of artificial intelligence: a call for international action", "kind": "policy", "body": "Sean Flynn, Christophe Geiger, João Pedro Quintais, Thomas Margoni, Matthew Sag, Lucie Guibault and Michael Carroll", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2020", "citation": "42 European Intellectual Property Review 393 (2020)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/143086882/Implementing_User_Rights_for_Research_in_the_Field_of_Artificial_Intelligence.pdf", "source_url": "https://ip.mpg.de/en/publications/details/implementing-user-rights-for-research-in-the-field-of-artificial-intelligence-a-call-for-action-at-international-level.html", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "park-jon-2024", "title": "A study on the protection of AI-generated works, focusing on the degree of human involvement", "kind": "policy", "body": "Chanhyeok Park and WooJung Jon (KAIST)", "jurisdiction": "South Korea", "region": "South Korea", "date": "2024-12", "citation": "Copyright Quarterly (Korea Copyright Commission), Winter 2024", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://www.copyright.or.kr/eng/doc/quarterly_pdf/406%20A%20Study%20on%20the%20Protection%20of%20AI-Generated%20Works-%20Focusing%20on%20the%20Degree%20of%20Human%20Involvement%20-.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.copyright.or.kr/eng/doc/quarterly_pdf/406%20A%20Study%20on%20the%20Protection%20of%20AI-Generated%20Works-%20Focusing%20on%20the%20Degree%20of%20Human%20Involvement%20-.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "bridy-2012", "title": "Coding creativity: copyright and the artificially intelligent author", "kind": "policy", "body": "Annemarie Bridy (University of Idaho)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2012", "citation": "2012 Stanford Technology Law Review 5", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5ru6m", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5ru6m", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "eu-ai-act-training-summary-2025", "title": "EU AI Act: public summary of training content (Art. 53(1)(d))", "kind": "act", "body": "European Union (AI Act), with the European Commission AI Office template", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-07-24", "citation": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Art. 53(1)(d); Commission template of 24 July 2025", "issue": "ai-transparency", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj", "source_url": "https://wilmerhale.com/en/insights/blogs/wilmerhale-privacy-and-cybersecurity-law/european-commission-releases-mandatory-template-for-public-disclosure-of-ai-training-data", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "california-ab2013-2024", "title": "California AB 2013: Generative AI Training Data Transparency Act", "kind": "act", "body": "California Legislature", "jurisdiction": "California", "region": "United States", "date": "2024", "citation": "Cal. Assembly Bill 2013 (2024), in force 1 January 2026", "issue": "ai-transparency", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "legislation", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2013", "source_url": "https://www.crowell.com/en/insights/client-alerts/californias-ab-2013-requires-generative-ai-data-disclosure-by-january-1-2026", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "nyt-openai-mtd-2025", "title": "New York Times v. Microsoft and OpenAI (motion to dismiss)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-04-04", "citation": "No. 1:23-cv-11195 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2025) (Stein, J.)", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/yf%2023cv11195%20OpenAI%20MTD%20opinion%20april%204%202025.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.mckoolsmith.com/assets/htmldocuments/2025%2004%2011%20Why%20OpenAI%20Opinion%20Provides%20Roadmap%20for%20Practitioners-%20Counsel.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "gema-suno-2026", "title": "GEMA v. Suno", "kind": "court", "body": "Landgericht München I (Regional Court)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2026-07-31", "citation": "Case 42 O 763/25 (LG München I, 31 July 2026)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/3890", "source_url": "https://cms.law/en/gbr/publication/artificial-intelligence-and-copyright-case-tracker/germany-gema-v.-suno-31-july-2026", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "like-company-google-2025", "title": "Like Company v. Google (C-250/25, reference to the CJEU)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Justice of the EU (reference from the Budapest-környéki Törvényszék)", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-04-03", "citation": "Case C-250/25, Like Company v Google Ireland", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "apex", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-250/25", "source_url": "https://www.stephensonharwood.com/insights/cjeu-to-rule-on-ai-and-copyright-in-a-landmark-case-against-google/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "hangzhou-ultraman-2024", "title": "Ultraman LoRA case (Xinchuanghua v. Shuimu)", "kind": "court", "body": "Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2024-12-30", "citation": "Shanghai Xinchuanghua Cultural Development Co. v Hangzhou Shuimu Intelligent Technology Co. (second instance, 30 December 2024)", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "yes", "position": 1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://cms.law/en/int/publication/artificial-intelligence-and-copyright-case-tracker/china-shanghai-xinchuanghua-cultural-development-co.-ltd.-v-hangzhou-shuimu-intelligent-technology-co.-ltd.-30-december-2024", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "munich-ai-logos-2026", "title": "AI-generated logos case (Local Court Munich)", "kind": "court", "body": "Amtsgericht München (Local Court Munich)", "jurisdiction": "Germany", "region": "Europe", "date": "2026-02-13", "citation": "AG München, Endurteil v. 13.02.2026, 142 C 9786/25", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Pdf/Y-300-Z-BECKRS-B-2026-N-1513?all=False", "source_url": "https://cms.law/en/int/publication/artificial-intelligence-and-copyright-case-tracker/germany-anonymous-creator-of-ai-generated-logos-and-operator-of-personal-website-v-anonymous-user-of-the-claimant-s-logos-on-his-own-personal-web", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dpg-howardshome-2024", "title": "DPG Media v. HowardsHome", "kind": "court", "body": "Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court of Amsterdam)", "jurisdiction": "Netherlands", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024-10-30", "citation": "DPG Media, Mediahuis v Knowledge Exchange (HowardsHome), Rb. Amsterdam 30 October 2024", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://cms.law/en/int/publication/artificial-intelligence-and-copyright-case-tracker/the-netherlands-dpg-media-b.v.-mediahuis-nederland-b.v.-mediahuis-nrc-b.v.-v-knowledge-exchange-b.v.-trading-as-howards-home-30-october-2024", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "andersen-stability-2024", "title": "Andersen v. Stability AI (motion to dismiss)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2024-08-12", "citation": "No. 3:23-cv-00201 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2024) (Orrick, J.)", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "first-instance", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66732129/andersen-v-stability-ai-ltd/", "source_url": "https://copyrightalliance.org/andersen-v-stability-ai-copyright-case/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "doe-github-9th-2026", "title": "Doe v. GitHub (Copilot appeal)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2026-09-16", "citation": "No. 24-7700 (9th Cir. Sept. 16, 2026)", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10974713/doe-v-github-inc/", "source_url": "https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/09/ninth-circuit-rules-generative-ai-outputs-are-not-stripped-copies-under-the-dmca", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "thaler-vidal-2022", "title": "Thaler v. Vidal (DABUS)", "kind": "court", "body": "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2022-08-05", "citation": "43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022)", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2347.OPINION.8-5-2022_1988142.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/intellectual-property/thaler-v-vidal-federal-circuit-nixes-artificial-intelligence-inventor/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-japan-iphc-2025", "title": "DABUS (Intellectual Property High Court of Japan)", "kind": "court", "body": "Intellectual Property High Court of Japan", "jurisdiction": "Japan", "region": "Japan", "date": "2025-01-30", "citation": "Reiwa 6 (Gyo-Ko) No. 10006, 30 January 2025", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://www.aippi.org/news/ai-as-an-inventor-of-patents-ip-high-court-judgment-and-the-2025-ip-strategic-program/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-korea-2024", "title": "DABUS (Seoul High Court)", "kind": "court", "body": "Seoul High Court", "jurisdiction": "South Korea", "region": "South Korea", "date": "2024-05-16", "citation": "Seoul High Court, 16 May 2024, affirming Seoul Administrative Court 2022GuHap89524 (2023)", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://apaaonline.org/article/can-artificial-intelligence-ai-be-an-inventor-the-answer-is-no-in-korea/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "dabus-swiss-2025", "title": "DABUS (Swiss Federal Administrative Court)", "kind": "court", "body": "Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland", "jurisdiction": "Switzerland", "region": "Europe", "date": "2025-06-26", "citation": "Federal Administrative Court, judgment of 26 June 2025, B-2532/2024", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://entscheidsuche.ch/docs/CH_BVGer/CH_BVGE_001_B-2532-2024_2025-06-26.pdf", "source_url": "https://www.lenzstaehelin.com/fr/news-insights/browse-thought-leadership-insights/insights-detail/ai-cannot-be-an-inventor-swiss-court-clarifies-status-of-ai-generated-inventions-in-patent-law/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "uspto-inventorship-guidance-2025", "title": "USPTO revised inventorship guidance for AI-assisted inventions", "kind": "office", "body": "U.S. Patent and Trademark Office", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-11-26", "citation": "Revised Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions (November 2025), rescinding the February 2024 guidance", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "guidance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.uspto.gov/subscription-center/2025/revised-inventorship-guidance-ai-assisted-inventions", "source_url": "https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/12/alerts-lifesciences-uspto-issues-revised-inventorship-guidance", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "theatre-opera-spatial-2023", "title": "Théâtre D'opéra Spatial (Copyright Office Review Board)", "kind": "office", "body": "U.S. Copyright Office Review Board", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-09-05", "citation": "Second request for reconsideration, Théâtre D'opéra Spatial (5 September 2023)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "office", "status": "ongoing", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/Theatre-Dopera-Spatial.pdf", "source_url": "https://lawreview.syr.edu/algorithmic-artistry-the-copyright-office-stands-firm-in-its-fourth-refusal-to-register-ai-generated-works/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "suryast-2023", "title": "SURYAST (Copyright Office Review Board)", "kind": "office", "body": "U.S. Copyright Office Review Board", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-12-11", "citation": "Second request for reconsideration, SURYAST (11 December 2023)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "office", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/SURYAST.pdf", "source_url": "https://lawreview.syr.edu/algorithmic-artistry-the-copyright-office-stands-firm-in-its-fourth-refusal-to-register-ai-generated-works/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "charlesworth-2025", "title": "Generative AI's illusory case for fair use", "kind": "policy", "body": "Jacqueline C. Charlesworth (former General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025", "citation": "26 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 323 (2025)", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol26/iss4/7/", "source_url": "https://cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu-URL/wp-content/uploads/sites/356/2025/05/25192637/Charlesworth-FINAL.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "henderson-et-al-2023", "title": "Foundation models and fair use", "kind": "policy", "body": "Peter Henderson, Xuechen Li, Dan Jurafsky, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Mark A. Lemley and Percy Liang (Stanford University)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023", "citation": "SSRN 4404340 (2023); Journal of Machine Learning Research 24 (2023)", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404340", "source_url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4404340", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "rosati-2024", "title": "Infringing AI: liability for AI-generated outputs under international, EU and UK copyright law", "kind": "policy", "body": "Eleonora Rosati (Stockholm University)", "jurisdiction": "European Union", "region": "Europe", "date": "2024-10", "citation": "European Journal of Risk Regulation (2024), doi:10.1017/err.2024.72 (open access)", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.72", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.72", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "lemley-2024", "title": "How generative AI turns copyright law upside down", "kind": "policy", "body": "Mark A. Lemley (Stanford Law School)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2024-06", "citation": "25 Columbia Science and Technology Law Review (2024), doi:10.52214/stlr.v25i2.12761 (open access)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "academia", "primary_url": "https://doi.org/10.52214/stlr.v25i2.12761", "source_url": "https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4517702", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "usco-part2-2025", "title": "Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability", "kind": "policy", "body": "U.S. Copyright Office", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2025-01-29", "citation": "U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2 (January 2025)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://www.copyright.gov/ai/", "source_url": "https://ipwatchdog.com/2025/01/29/part-two-copyright-office-ai-report-says-creative-prompting-doesnt-constitute-authorship/id=185455/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "cnipa-ai-guidelines-2024", "title": "CNIPA guidelines for patent applications for AI-related inventions", "kind": "office", "body": "China National Intellectual Property Administration", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2024-12-31", "citation": "Guidelines for Patent Applications for AI-Related Inventions (Trial Implementation), 31 December 2024", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "guidance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://hlc.com/en/publications/navigating-ai-patent-applications-in-china-key-insights-from-cnipas-new-examination-guidelines", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "mexico-scjn-ai-authorship-2025", "title": "Amparo Directo 6/2025 (AI avatar)", "kind": "court", "body": "Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation of Mexico, Second Chamber", "jurisdiction": "Mexico", "region": "Latin America", "date": "2025-07-02", "citation": "Amparo Directo 6/2025 (SCJN, 2 July 2025)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "apex", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://bj.scjn.gob.mx/documento/sentencias_pub/233157", "source_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/600776", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "brazil-spitz-ecad-2025", "title": "Spitz Park v. ECAD (AI-generated music)", "kind": "court", "body": "Court of Appeal of Santa Catarina, Brazil", "jurisdiction": "Brazil", "region": "Latin America", "date": "2025-07-31", "citation": "Case No. 5032376-37.2025.8.24.0000 (TJSC, 31 July 2025)", "issue": "ai-output", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "appellate", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/3895", "source_url": "https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/600761", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "tencent-dreamwriter-2019", "title": "Tencent v. Yingxun (Dreamwriter)", "kind": "court", "body": "Shenzhen Nanshan District People's Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2019-12", "citation": "Shenzhen Nanshan District People's Court (December 2019)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "yes", "position": 0.5, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://connectontech.bakermckenzie.com/chinese-dreamwriter-decision-a-dream-come-true-for-ai-generated-works/", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "feilin-baidu-2019", "title": "Feilin v. Baidu", "kind": "court", "body": "Beijing Internet Court", "jurisdiction": "China", "region": "China", "date": "2019-04-25", "citation": "Beijing Feilin Law Firm v Baidu, (2019) Jing 0491 Min Chu No. 239 (25 April 2019)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "no", "position": -1, "level": "first-instance", "status": "current", "source_group": "", "primary_url": "", "source_url": "https://law.uct.ac.za/ip-chair/articles/2019-09-10-beijing-internet-court-refuses-copyright-ai-created-work", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "alai-resolution-ai-2024", "title": "ALAI Resolution on artificial intelligence and copyright", "kind": "policy", "body": "ALAI (Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale), Executive Committee", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2024-02-17", "citation": "ALAI Executive Committee resolution, Paris, 17 February 2024", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -1, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "https://www.alai.cz/files/ALAI_Resolution_IA_17022024_EN_clean.pdf", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "inta-ai-principles-2025", "title": "INTA foundational principles on AI and IP rights", "kind": "policy", "body": "International Trademark Association (Board of Directors)", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2025-05", "citation": "INTA Board resolution, May 2025", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "none", "position": null, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "https://www.inta.org/news-and-press/press-releases/inta-board-of-directors-adopts-foundational-principles-on-ai-and-ip-rights/", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ficpi-ai-inventorship-2023", "title": "FICPI comments on AI and inventorship", "kind": "policy", "body": "FICPI (International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys)", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2023-05", "citation": "FICPI comments to the USPTO, May 2023", "issue": "ai-inventorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "https://downloads.regulations.gov/PTO-P-2022-0045-0029/attachment_1.pdf", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "ipo-ai-comments-2023", "title": "IPO comments on AI and copyright and on AI-assisted inventions", "kind": "policy", "body": "Intellectual Property Owners Association (US)", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2023-10", "citation": "IPO comments to the U.S. Copyright Office (October 2023) and USPTO (May 2024)", "issue": "ai-authorship", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "https://ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/IPO-Comments-to-U.S.-Copyright-Office-re-AI-and-Copyright.pdf", "source_url": "https://ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/IPO-Comments-in-Response-to-Inventorship-Guidance-for-AI-Assisted-Inventions-May-13-2024.pdf", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "aipla-ai-comments-2020", "title": "AIPLA comments on IP protection for AI innovation", "kind": "policy", "body": "American Intellectual Property Law Association", "jurisdiction": "United States", "region": "United States", "date": "2020-01-13", "citation": "AIPLA comments to the USPTO, 13 January 2020", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": 0, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "professional", "primary_url": "https://www.aipla.org/detail/advocacy-article/aipla-comments-to-uspto-on-request-for-comments-on-intellectual-property-protection-for-artificial-intelligence-innovation", "source_url": "", "reviewed": false }, { "id": "pace-resolution-2654-2026", "title": "PACE Resolution 2654: Copyright enforcement in the AI environment", "kind": "policy", "body": "Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe", "jurisdiction": "International", "region": "International", "date": "2026-04-23", "citation": "Resolution 2654 (2026), adopted 23 April 2026", "issue": "training-data", "answer": "partly", "position": -0.5, "level": "proposal", "status": "current", "source_group": "policymaker", "primary_url": "https://pace.coe.int/en/files/36006/html", "source_url": "https://merlin.obs.coe.int/article/10535", "reviewed": false } ] }